Currency

His-tag Protein Purification Kit

€ 105,00

Beyotime’s His-tag Protein Purification Kit (Reductant&Chelator-resistant) provides Purification Resin, Empty Affinity Chromatography Columns, and ready-to-use buffers, enabling convenient, rapid, and highly efficient purification of His-tagged proteins from cell lysates. This product is compatible with reductants and chelants.

Package: 10ml

Description

Beyotime’s His-tag Protein Purification Kit (Reductant&Chelator-resistant) provides Purification Resin, Empty Affinity Chromatography Columns, and ready-to-use buffers, enabling convenient, rapid, and highly efficient purification of His-tagged proteins from cell lysates. This product is compatible with reductants and chelants.

A His-tag is a string of histidine residues, typically fused to the N or C terminus of a recombinant protein. The classic his-tag comprises 6 histidine residues, named hexahistidine tag (6xHis-tag). Some recombinant proteins are engineered to have two hexahistidine tags. The His-tag has a high affinity for nickel ions (Ni2+) which is immobilized on BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin. Therefore, the BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin can be used to purify His-tagged recombinant proteins from a crude lysate, while most other proteins in the lysate will not bind to the resin, or bind only weakly.

BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin has a strong affinity for His-tagged proteins, with high specificity and binding capacity, which enables simple, rapid, and efficient purification of the expressed His-tagged protein from a broad host such as bacteria, mammals, insects, Baculovirus, or yeast. The obtained His-tagged protein with high purity can be used for protein structure and function analysis, antibody preparation, protein interaction studies, protein-nucleic acid interaction studies, etc.

BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin is based on highly crossed-linked 6% agarose gel (Sepharose CL-6B) on which nickel ions are immobilized by the optimized arm coupling and chelating technology. Compared to other products with similar functions, BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin exhibits lower non-specificity, stronger resistance to pressure, and stabler binding of Ni2+ to the resin. The resin has minimal leaching of Ni2+ and can be reused many times without reloading nickel ions.

Ni-NTA agarose and most other nickel resin products are not compatible with commonly used concentrations of reducing agents, such as dithiothreitol (DTT) and β -mercaptoethanol, and chelating agents, such as EDTA. However, BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin (Reductant&Chelator-resistant) is compatible with 20mM DTT and 20mM EDTA, facilitating the purification of His-tagged proteins from samples containing reductants and/or chelants. This product is not compatible with 8M urea and 6M guanidine hydrochloride. To purify proteins from inclusion bodies that require 8M urea or 6M guanidine hydrochloride for protein solubilization, dialysis should be performed to remove urea and guanidine hydrochloride before using this product for protein purification.

BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin is a ready-to-use Ni2+ chelate blue resin, with a particle diameter of 45-165μm. It can withstand pressure up to 0.025MPa (~5.8psi). The recommended flow rate is 0.5ml/min when using a fixed flow rate for protein purification.

BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin binds His-tagged protein with high capacity and high specificity. Per milliliter of gel can bind up to 20-30mg of His-tagged protein. The maximum binding capacity in actual use depends on the molecular weight and characteristics of the protein to be purified. The larger the molecular weight, the greater the maximum binding capacity. For proteins with the same molecular weight, the maximum binding capacity of this resin might be different due to different characteristics of the proteins.

BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin (Reductant&Chelator-resistant) is stored in 30% ethanol. A total volume of 10ml consists of 5ml gel and 5ml liquid. It is advisable to fully resuspend the gel prior to use.

Per 10ml of BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin (Reductant&Chelator-resistant) can purify up to 100-150mg of His-tagged recombinant protein.

This product is sufficient for 10 purifications if 1 gram of wet bacterial pellet is used for each purification. Up to 10-15mg of purified protein can be obtained from each purification, which is dependent on the molecular weight of protein. For a His-tagged recombinant protein with a molecular weight of 50kD, 3-10mg of purified protein can be obtained from each purification. Without using the Empty Affinity Chromatography Column, this product is sufficient for 500 small-scale purifications when following the protocol provided in this kit.

Packing List:
Item Component Quantity
P2226-1 BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin (Reductant&Chelator-resistant) 10ml
P2226-2 Native Lysis Buffer 120ml
P2226-3 Native Wash Buffer 60ml
P2226-4 Native Elution Buffer 60ml
P2226-5 Lysozyme 60mg
P2226-6 Empty Affinity Chromatography Column (3ml) 10 sets
Manual – 1 copy
 
Storage Conditions:

Store reagents at 4℃ for up to 1 year. All reagents, except the BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin, can be stored at -20℃.

Precautions:

Store the BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin at 4℃ upon receipt. Do NOT freeze.

During the use of BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin (Reductant&Chelator-resistant), the concentrations of buffer reagents such as Tris, HEPES, and MOPS, should not exceed 100mM, EDTA should not exceed 20mM, SDS and sarkosyl should not exceed 0.3%, and the concentrations of Triton, Tween, and NP-40 should not exceed 2%. The concentrations of sodium deoxycholate and CHAPS should not exceed 1%, histidine should not exceed 20mM, calcium ions should not exceed 5mM, sodium and magnesium ions can be up to 2M, and glycerol can be up to 50%. The compatibility with other reagents not mentioned is yet to be tested.

Keep the gel moist during storage or purification.

A 0.45μm filter membrane can be used to remove particulates from cell lysates that could not be completely removed by centrifuge.

Protein samples should be purified after collection as soon as possible and kept at 4℃ or on ice to minimize protein degradation or denaturation. Protein degradation can also be inhibited by the addition of appropriate protease inhibitors in bacterial cell lysate.

If protein purification cannot be achieved ideally when using the conditions provided in this manual, optimize imidazole concentration and/or the pH of wash and elution buffers.

If denaturing agents must be used, we recommend using Beyotime’s His-tag Protein Purification Kit (Denaturant-resistant) .

This kit is for R&D only. Not for drug, household, or other uses.

For your safety and health, please wear lab coats and disposable gloves while handling kit reagents

Additional information

Weight 1 kg
Dimensions 30 × 30 × 20 cm

Instruction

Instructions for Use:

This protocol is provided for the purification of His-tagged recombinant protein from the E. coli expression system under native conditions. For protein purification from other expression systems, except for different protein expression methods, the purification procedures with this product are similar. For first-time users, please follow the protocol strictly. A Simplified Purification Protocol is also provided for users who are familiar with the Nickel resin purification system.
1.Induced expression of His-tagged recombinant protein in E. coli
IPTG is most commonly used to induce protein expression in E. coli, as described below. Please refer to appropriate instructions for other inducing systems.
a. Transform His-tagged protein expression plasmid into E. coli competent cells designed for protein expression specifically. After overnight incubation, culture a single colony in 3ml or 10-20ml of LB medium containing appropriate antibiotics.
b. Add the overnight bacteria culture solution into the new LB medium preheated to 37℃ at a ratio of 1:20 (e.g. Add 5ml bacteria culture into 100ml of LB medium containing appropriate antibiotics).
Note 1: Scale up or down the LB medium, depending on your experimental requirements. For optimization of protein expression conditions, 3-10ml LB medium is generally used. For protein purification, 100ml or more should be considered.
Note 2: To get a better expression effect, we recommend a ratio of 1:100, but it will take longer for the culture to reach the optimal OD600 required for IPTG induction.
c. Cultivate E. coli at 37℃ with vigorous shaking in a shaker until the OD600 of bacteria culture reaches 0.6.
d. Add IPTG to bacteria culture at a final concentration of 1mM, and continue cultivation for 4-5 hours with vigorous shaking at 37℃.
Note 1: The optimal IPTG concentration, duration of IPTG induction, and temperature during the induction should be determined experimentally for different proteins.
Note 2: A small amount of bacterial culture solution can be taken before and after IPTG induction to examine the induced expression level of His-tagged protein.
e. Harvest bacteria by centrifugation at 4000g for 20 minutes at 4℃, or 15,000g for 1 minute. Discard supernatant. Proceed to bacteria lysis immediately, or freeze the pellet at -20℃ or -80℃ for later use. The frozen bacteria should be thawed on ice for 15 minutes prior to bacteria lysis.
2.Small-scale purification of His-tagged protein under native conditions
This method is generally used for small-scale protein purifications or optimizing conditions for protein expression and purification on a large scale.
a. Following step 1e, add 100μl of lysis buffer to the bacteria pellet obtained per ml of LB culture. Resuspend the pellet completely by pipetting or vortex gently (avoid bubbles).
Note: Based on the expression level of His-tagged recombinant proteins, the volume ratio of bacteria culture to lysis buffer can be optimized between 25:1 and 5:1. When the expression level is very high, use 200μl of lysis buffer for bacteria pellet per ml of LB culture, while when expression level is very low, use 40μl of lysis buffer. After lysis, the lysate can be used directly for SDS-PAGE analysis. When necessary, an appropriate protease inhibitor can be added to the lysis buffer to minimize protein degradation.
b. Add lysozyme to bacteria suspension at a final concentration of 1mg/ml, mix gently, and incubate on ice for 30 minutes.
Note: A lysozyme stock of 100mg/ml prepared with lysis buffer can be used. Aliquot the lysozyme stock solution and store at -20℃.
c. Gently vortex several times during the incubation to ensure sufficient lysis of bacteria, avoiding bubble production.
d. Centrifuge at 15000g for 10 minutes at 4℃, take 10μl of supernatant for SDS-PAGE analysis, and collect the rest into another new centrifuge tube for protein purification.
e. Add 20μl BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin (resuspend evenly prior to use) into the supernatant of lysate, and incubate for 30 minutes at 4℃ with agitation on a shaker to ensure a sufficient binding between His-tagged proteins and the resin.
Note: An incubation time of 30 minutes is usually sufficient for protein binding, but can be prolonged or even overnight under certain circumstances. Using the BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin directly without pre-washing has been tested to work efficiently. However, protein yield can be increased by 5-20% if the resin is equilibrated 2-3 times with a bed volume of lysis buffer prior to use.
f. Pellet the resin by centrifugation at 1000g for 10 seconds at 4℃, take 20μl of supernatant for SDS-PAGE analysis and discard the rest.
g. Resuspend resin with 40μl of wash buffer by pipetting gently, and centrifuge at 1000g for 10 seconds at 4℃. Take 20μl of supernatant for SDS-PAGE analysis and discard the rest.
h. Repeat step g once.
i. Add 20μl of elution buffer and resuspend the resin by pipetting gently. Centrifuge at 1000g for 10 seconds at 4℃, and then collect the supernatant that contains the purified His-tagged protein.
j. To increase protein recovery, step i can be repeated twice and a total 60μl of purified protein can be obtained.
3.Large-scale purification of His-tagged proteins under native conditions
a. Following step 1e, add 4ml (2-5ml generally) of lysis buffer per gram of bacteria pellet to resuspend bacteria completely. If necessary, an appropriate amount of protease inhibitor can be added to the lysis buffer to minimize protein degradation.
b. Add lysozyme to bacteria suspension at a final concentration of 1mg/ml, mix gently, and incubate on ice for 30 minutes.
Note: A lysozyme stock of 100mg/ml prepared with lysis buffer can be used. Aliquot the lysozyme stock solution and store at -20℃.
c. Using a sonicator with a power of 200-300W, sonicate the solution on ice using six 10-second bursts at high intensity with a 10-second cooling period between each burst to keep the sample cold.
Note: The number of pulses, pulse duration, and pulse intensity should be optimized for each sample type according to the specific type of ultrasonic instrument.
d. (Optional) If the lysate is very viscous after sonication, add RNase A to 10 μg/ml and DNase I to 5 μg/ml, and incubate on ice for 10-15 minutes. Alternatively, draw the lysate through a syringe needle several times to break the viscous genomic DNA.
e. Centrifuge the lysate at 10,000g for 20-30min at 4℃. Transfer the supernatant to a new tube and keep it on ice. Take 20μl of supernatant for SDS-PAGE analysis.
Note: The supernatant must be completely clear before loading to BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin. The presence of insoluble particulates will severely affect the purity of His-tagged proteins obtained subsequently. It is good practice to filter the lysates just prior to loading using a 0.45μm filter even if they have been filtered several days before the purification.
f. Take 1ml of BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin (resuspend evenly prior to use), centrifuge at 1000g for 10 seconds at 4℃, and discard the supernatant. Add 0.5ml of lysis buffer to resuspend the resin evenly, centrifuge again, and discard the supernatant. Repeat resin equilibration 1-2 times with lysis buffer, centrifuge, and discard the supernatant.
Note: BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin can also be used directly without equilibration, but protein yield may decrease by 5-20%.
g. Add 4ml of bacteria lysate obtained in step 2e to the equilibrated His-tag Purification Resin (about 0.5ml). Mix well and incubate for 60 minutes with gentle agitation on a side or horizontal shaker at 4℃.
h. Load the mixture of lysate and resin into a suitable empty chromatography column, such as Beyotime Affinity Chromatography Empty Column.
Note: Resin can be loaded into an Empty Affinity Chromatography Column either before or after protein binding. Loading resin after protein binding can ensure a sufficient binding of His-tagged protein with the resin, especially when the His-tag is partially blocked by the fusion protein or the expression of His-tagged recombinant protein is very low. If performing resin packing before protein binding, equilibrate the column with 0.5ml of lysis buffer 2-3 times after packing, and then load 4ml of lysate onto the column. The flow through of the lysate can be reloaded onto column 3-5 times to ensure sufficient binding of His-tagged proteins.
i. Remove the snap-off cap at the bottom of the column, and allow the liquid to flow out of the column by gravity. Collect 20 μl of flow-through liquid for SDS-PAGE analysis.
j. Wash the resin by adding 0.5-1ml of wash buffer and allow the liquid to flow out by gravity. Collect 20 μl of flow-through liquid for SDS-PAGE analysis. Repeat washing 5 times. Protein content in the flow-through can be examined by the Bradford method (Beyotime, P0006) to determine whether the washing is sufficient.
Note: Increase the number of washes 2-3 times to improve protein purity.
k. Elute protein 6-10 times, with 0.5ml of elution buffer each. Collect each eluate into different centrifuge tubes and determine the protein concentration of each eluate using the Bradford method. Pool the eluates containing the purified protein. Please refer to Figure 1 for the SDS-PAGE analysis of collected samples during the purification process.

Figure 1. SDS-PAGE analysis of collected samples during the purification process with Beyotime’s His-tag Protein Purification Kit (P2226). M. Marker; CL. Cell lysate; FT. Flow-through; W1-W3. Wash 1-3 with wash buffer; E1-E4. Eluate 1-4 with elution buffer. This figure is for reference only, which may vary due to different experimental conditions.
4.Simplified purification protocol
a. Harvest bacterial cells by centrifugation after the induced expression of His-tagged protein.
b. Add 4ml of lysis buffer per gram of wet bacteria pellet to resuspend bacteria completely, and an appropriate amount of protease inhibitor to minimize protein degradation.
c. Add lysozyme to bacteria suspension at a final concentration of 1mg/ml, mix gently, and incubate on ice for 30 minutes.
Note: A lysozyme stock of 100mg/ml prepared with lysis buffer can be used. Aliquot the lysozyme stock and store at -20℃.
d. Sonicate bacteria suspension on ice, centrifuge, and collect the supernatant.
e. Load 1ml of BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin suspension into an empty chromatography column, and equilibrate the resin with 1ml of lysis buffer 2-3 times.
f.  Load lysate supernatant obtained in step 4d onto the column.
Note: The flow through can be reloaded 3-5 times to ensure a sufficient binding of His-tagged proteins to the resin.
g. Wash resin 5 times, with 0.5ml of wash buffer each.
Note: If the concentration of imidazole in the wash buffer is low for your experiment, more imidazole can be supplemented in the wash buffer. Otherwise, the lysis buffer can be used for the washing.
h. Elute protein 6-10 times, with 0.5ml of elution buffer each.
Note: The provided elution method usually works well. But in some cases, the imidazole concentration in the elution buffer can be increased to 100-250mM to improve the elution result.

FAQ:

Problem Possible Causes Solutions
His-tagged protein does not bind with BeyoGold™ His-tag Purification Resin. Incorrect ORF of fusion protein. Check if the fusion protein has the correct ORF by sequencing.
His-tag might be embedded in the protein structure. Fuse His-tag at the other end of the target protein.
Insufficient binding time. Prolong the protein binding time.
Low expression of fusion protein. Reload the flow-through of lysate several times onto precast column.
Inappropriate pH of buffer system. The pH of buffers should be at 8.
Incompatible reagent components or concentrations. Ensure the resin is compatible with reagents used, as well as their concentrations.
High imidazole concentration. Decrease imidazole concentration of lysis or wash buffer.
His-tagged protein is eluted by the wash buffer High imidazole in wash buffer. Decrease imidazole concentration of wash buffer.
Inappropriate wash buffer. Check the pH and components of the wash buffer.
Resin is incompatible with the wash buffer Ensure the resin is compatible with components in the wash buffer, as well as their concentrations.
Protein precipitates during the purification Inappropriate temperature Purify protein at room temperature (22-25℃)
Low protein solubility Supplement the buffer with surfactants, such as 0.1% Tween-20 or Triton X-100, to increase protein solubility.
Protein could not be eluted from the resin Inappropriate pH or imidazole concentration of elution buffer. Optimize elution conditions by eluting with gradient pH or imidazole concentration.
His-tagged protein is coeluted with other proteins.
(Low purity)
Low imidazole concentration in lysis or wash buffer. Increase imidazole concentration in lysis or wash buffer appropriately.
Too much resin used. Reduce the amount of resin.
Presence of abundant intra- and inter-molecular disulfide bonds Add DTT or β-mercaptoethanol to reduce disulfide bonds.
High nonspecificity. Increase the concentration of salt or surfactant, or add ethanol or glycerol to the wash buffer to reduce nonspecific interactions.
Presence of truncated version of His-tagged protein. Check whether the fusion gene contains an intra start codon (His-tag at C-terminus) or an early termination site (His-tag at N-terminus).

 

Product files

MSDS

https://scandicbiotech.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/P2226.pdf

References

Related papers:

1. Jia Wang, Haopeng Yu, Qian Ma, Pengguihang Zeng, Danya Wu, Yingping Hou, Xinyi Liu, Lumeng Jia, Jun Sun, Yilong Chen, Diana Guallar, Miguel Fidalgo, Jiahao Chen, Yangyinhui Yu, Shaoshuai Jiang, Fenjie Li, Cai Zhao, Xianglin Huang, Jianlong Wang, Cheng Li, Yujie Sun, Xiaoxi Zeng, Wei Zhang, Yiliang Miao, Junjun Ding
.
Cell Stem Cell. 2021 Oct 7;28(10):1868-1883.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.04.023. (IF 20.86)
2. Yang Tian, Ning Wan, Hanqing Zhang, Chang Shao, Ming Ding, Qiuyu Bao, Haiyang Hu, Huiyong Sun, Chenguang Liu, Kun Zhou, Shuai Chen, Guangji Wang, Hui Ye, Haiping Hao
.
Nat Chem Biol. 2023 Jun 15. doi: 10.1038/s41589-023-01355-w. (IF 12.587)
3. Wentao Chen, Hao Luo, Lihong Zeng, Yuying Pan, Jonathan B Parr, Yinbo Jiang, Clark H Cunningham, Kelly L Hawley, Justin D Radolf, Wujian Ke, Jiangli Ou, Jianjiang Yang, Bin Yang, Heping Zheng
.
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 9;13(1):4671. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32250-y. (IF 12.121)
4. Dan Wang, Zheng Zhou, Erzhong Wu, Can Ouyang, Guifeng Wei, Yunfei Wang, Dandan He, Ya Cui, Dongdong Zhang, Xiaomin Chen, Simon H Reed, Jianjun Luo, Runsheng Chen
.
Cell Death Differ. 2020 Dec;27(12):3337-3353. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-0581-5. (IF 10.717)
5. Yu Yan, Peng Wang, Yunxie Wei, Yujing Bai, Yi Lu, Hongqiu Zeng, Guoyin Liu, Russel J Reiter, Chaozu He, Haitao Shi
.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2021 Apr;19(4):785-800. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13505. (IF 8.154)
6. Danrui Cui, Xiufang Xiong, Jianfeng Shu, Xiaoqing Dai, Yi Sun, Yongchao Zhao
.
Cell Rep. 2020 Jan 14;30(2):497-509.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.032. (IF 8.109)
7. Xiaoli Cui, Ruijin Zhang, Ye Yang, Erzhong Wu, Yiheng Tang, Zhihua Zhao, Chao Li, Lei Yang, Xueyi Teng, Yanzhen Ye, Ya Cui, Feng Xu, Zewen Su, Dongpeng Wang, Dongdong Zhang, Yan Yang, Jianyuan Sun, Jianjun Luo, Shuli Zhang, Runsheng Chen, Jianzhong Jeff Xi
.
Cell Rep. 2022 Feb 22;38(8):110398. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110398. (IF 8.109)
8. Qidong Li, Hanhui Yao, Yichun Wang, Yang Wu, Rick F Thorne, Youming Zhu, Mian Wu, Lianxin Liu
.
Cell Rep. 2022 Nov 22;41(8):111707. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111707. (IF 8.109)
9. Yao-Shun Yang, Xi-Zheng Jia, Qian-Yun Lu, Sun-Li Cai, Xue-Ting Huang, Shu-Hua Yang, Chris Wood, Yue-Hong Wang, Jiao-Jiao Zhou, Yi-Ding Chen, Jin-Shu Yang, Wei-Jun Yang
.
Oncogene. 2022 Apr;41(18):2624-2637. doi: 10.1038/s41388-022-02278-x. (IF 7.971)
10. Ling C, Qiao GQ, Shuai BW, Olavarria K, Yin J, Xiang RJ, Song KN, Shen YH, Guo Y, Chen GQ
.
Metab Eng. 2018 Sep;49:275-286. (IF 7.263)
11. Xunxun Wu, Lian Liu, Qiuling Zheng, Haiping Hao, Hui Ye, Ping Li, Hua Yang
.
Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021 Nov;11(11):3553-3566. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.03.021. (IF 7.097)
12. Liu C, Jiang W, Tian X, Yang P, Xiao L, Li J, Qiu L, Tu H, Tan W
.
Anal Chem. 2019 May 21 91(10):6675-6681. (IF 6.785)
13. Hairong Shi, Hongshun Wang, Cheng Zhang, Yajie Lu, Jun Yao, Zhibin Chen, Guangqian Xing, Qinjun Wei, Xin Cao
.
JCI Insight. 2022 Feb 22;7(4):e149626. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.149626. (IF 6.205)
14. Yu Yan, Peng Wang, Yi Lu, Yujing Bai, Yunxie Wei, Guoyin Liu, Haitao Shi
.
Plant J. 2021 Aug;107(3):847-860. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15350. (IF 6.141)
15. Xingchen Huo, Zhensheng Wang, Xun Xiao, Chunrong Yang, Jianguo Su
.
Front Immunol. 2022 Jan 11;12:811616. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.811616. (IF 5.085)
16. Pu Z, Che Y, Zhang W, Sun H, Meng T, Xie H, Cao L, Hao H
.
Int J Mol Med. 2019 Jun 43(6):2291-2302. (IF 3.098)
18. Chen Q, Zhou W, Qian C, Shen K, Zhu X, Zhou D, Sun Z, Lu W, Liu H, Li K, Xu T, Bao Q, Lu J
.
Front Microbiol. 2019 Nov 26 10:2732. (IF 4.235)
19. Yanli Chang, Yujing Bai, Yunxie Wei, Haitao Shi
.
Tree Physiol. 2020 Oct 29;40(11):1520-1533. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpaa093. (IF 3.655)
20. Guobei Yan, N A Liu, Junhua Wang, Jun Tian, Hongbin Liu, Suping Li, Wenchao Liu, Xiaoliang Li, Kai Li, Hong Wang
.
J Biosci. 2021;46:19.
21. Ning Zhang, Lingran Zhang, Linjie Li, Junyou Geng, Lei Zhao, Yan Ren, Zhongdong Dong, Feng Chen
.
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2021 Feb 10;S1672-0229(21)00007-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2020.06.008.
22. Guobei Yan, Na Liu, Jun Tian, Yanli Fu, Wei Wei, Jingjing Zou, Suping Li, Qing Wang, Kai Li, Junhua Wang
.
J Cell Mol Med. 2021 Mar;25(6):3149-3159. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16306. (IF 4.486)
23. Rongcan Luo, Yu Fan, Jing Yang, Maosen Ye, Deng-Feng Zhang, Kun Guo, Xiao Li, Rui Bi, Min Xu, Lu-Xiu Yang, Yu Li, Xiaoqian Ran, Hong-Yan Jiang, Chen Zhang, Liwen Tan, Nengyin Sheng, Yong-Gang Yao
.
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021 Aug 31;6(1):325. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00748-4.
24. Qian Ma, Jia Wang, Haopeng Yu, Junyi Sun, Jun Sun, Jiahao Chen, Yangyinhui Yu, Peihang Fang, Qi Tian, Junjun Ding
.
STAR Protoc. 2021 Oct 14;2(4):100887. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100887.
25. Yan Hu, Ya-Ping Liang, Hang-Yu Tian, Cui-Xian Xu, Dan Yu, Pan Zhang, Hui Ye, Ming Li
.
Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2022 May;110(1):e21877. doi: 10.1002/arch.21877.
26. Ming-Li Li, Sheng Wang, Penghui Xu, Hang-Yu Tian, Mixue Bai, Ya-Ping Zhang, Yong Shao, Zi-Jun Xiong, Xiao-Guang Qi, David N Cooper, Guojie Zhang, He Helen Zhu, Dong-Dong Wu
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 4;119(40):e2123030119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2123030119.
27. Yang Wu, Yichun Wang, Hanhui Yao, Heng Li, Fanzheng Meng, Qidong Li, Xiansheng Lin, Lianxin Liu
.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Dec 7;41(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02547-3.
28. Wei Bai, Yunxia Zhang, Jun Ma, Mengmeng Du, Haiyang Xu, Jian Wang, Lu Zhang, Wentao Li, Yunqing Hou, Xiaomeng Liu, Xinyue Zhang, Yaxin Peng, Jianan Li, Xizhen Zhan, Wei Jiang, Shengsi Liu, Xiao Liu, Qinying Li, Yang Miao, Mengru Sui, Yuhan Yang, Shenghao Zhang, Zaiyan Xu, Bo Zuo
.
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2023 Jan 5;80(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04680-w.
29. Shengyu Feng, Liuling Guo, Hao Wang, Shanshan Yang, Hailiang Liu
.
Commun Biol. 2023 Mar 2;6(1):235. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04613-8.
30. Yajie Tang, Shengming Ma, Sen Lin, Yinrong Wu, Siyang Chen, Gang Liu, Lisong Ma, Zaihua Wang, Lele Jiang, Yao Wang
.
Protein Expr Purif. 2023 Mar:203:106209. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2022.106209.
31. Ning Zhang, Sisheng Wang, Simin Zhao, Daiying Chen, Hongyan Tian, Jia Li, Lingran Zhang, Songgang Li, Lu Liu, Chaonan Shi, Xiaodong Yu, Yan Ren, Feng Chen
.
Sci Adv. 2023 May 10;9(19):eadg1012. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg1012.
32. Huabin Gao, Huiting Wei, Yang Yang, Hui Li, Jiangtao Liang, Jiecheng Ye, Fenfen Zhang, Liyuan Wang, Huijuan Shi, Jia Wang, Anjia Han
.
Oncogene. 2023 May;42(21):1704-1715. doi: 10.1038/s41388-023-02687-6.
33. Le Li, Yequn Wu, Kui Dai, Qing Wang, Shiqi Ye, Qipeng Shi, Zhenfei Chen, Yi-Chun Huang, Weiwei Zhao, Lijia Li
.
Cell Insight. 2023 Jun 4;2(4):100112. doi: 10.1016/j.cellin.2023.100112.
34. Qingqing Tian, Xingchen Huo, Qian Liu, Chunrong Yang, Yongan Zhang, Jianguo Su
.
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Aug 16;11(8):1373. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11081373.
35. Jiliang Cheng, Huan Du, Meng-Sha Zhou, Yuan Ji, You-Qun Xie, He-Biao Huang, Shu-Hui Zhang, Fen Li, Lei Xiang, Quan-Ying Cai, Yan-Wen Li, Hui Li, Meng Li, Hai-Ming Zhao, Ce-Hui Mo
.
Environ Int. 2023 Aug:178:108054. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108054.
36. Mengmeng Zhou, Guanqi Wang, Ruoyu Bai, Huiping Zhao, Zhongyuan Ge, Haitao Shi
.
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023 Aug:201:107814. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107814.
37. Hongjiao Li, Yi Wang, Shuang Feng, Kaijing Chang, Xinwen Yu, Fenfang Yang, Haozhe Huang, Yuanbo Wang, Xiang Li, Feng Guan
.
Cell Commun Signal. 2023 Sep 22;21(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01278-y.
38. Desheng Zhang, Sen Jiang, Nengwen Xia, Youwen Zhang, Jiajia Zhang, Anjing Liu, Chenyang Zhang, Nanhua Chen, Francois Meurens, Wanglong Zheng, Jianzhong Zhu
.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Nov 30;13(23):3712. doi: 10.3390/ani13233712.
39. Yan Sun, Xin Jin, Junpeng Meng, Feng Guo, Taoyu Chen, Xiaoyan Zhao, Heshui Wu, Dianyun Ren
.
EMBO J. 2023 Dec 1;42(23):e114558. doi: 10.15252/embj.2023114558.
40. Ligang Yu, Xiaojie Wang, Chunlei Tang, Huiqing Wang, Hojjatollah Rabbani Nasab, Zhensheng Kang, Jianfeng Wang
.
J Agric Food Chem. 2023 Dec 20;71(50):19986-19999. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c06280.
41. Wei Lu, Shihan Zhou, Xueli Ma, Nuo Xu, Dongxin Liu, Keqing Zhang, Yongke Zheng, Shenghai Wu
.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Feb 6;12(2):e0254223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02542-23.
42. Beifang Wang, Pao Xue, Yingxin Zhang, Xiaodeng Zhan, Weixun Wu, Ping Yu, Daibo Chen, Junlin Fu, Yongbo Hong, Xihong Shen, Lianping Sun, Shihua Cheng, Qunen Liu, Liyong Cao
.
Plant Commun. 2024 Mar 11;5(3):100780. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100780.

Related products

  • Actin Mouse Monoclonal Antibody

    This product is a β-actin mouse monoclonal antibody prepared using a synthetic peptide of N-terminal β-actin as antigen. The clone number is AC-74. This Actin antibody recognizes only β-actin in Western blot or immunostaining analysis. Package: 40T

  • Actin-Tracker Red-555

    Actin-Tracker Red-555 is a red fluorescent probe that specifically binds and labels filamentous actin (F-actin) in cultured cells or tissue sections. Package: 0.2ml

  • Akt Rabbit Polyclonal Antibody

    This product is a high-purity polyclonal antibody obtained by immunizing rabbit with a synthetic mouse Akt C-terminal segment with appropriate modifications and then purified in two steps using protein A and antigen peptide affinity chromatography. Package:10T, 10ul

  • Alexa Fluor 488-labeled Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG(H+L)

    AF488-labeled Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) is a secondary antibody for immunofluorescence staining. Alexa Fluor (AF) dyes, trademarked by Molecular Probes, are advanced fluorescent dyes derived from Coumarin, Rhodamine, Xanthene, and Cyanine via sulfonation and chemical modification (e.g., Alexa Fluor 488, or AF488). Package: 100ul

  • Alexa Fluor 555-labeled Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG(H+L)

    AF555-labeled Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) is a secondary antibody for immunofluorescence staining. Package: 100ul

Please enter your email address to receive your cart as a PDF.